Thyroid Lobectomy for T1 Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in Pediatric Patients.

Importance: The current recommendation for pediatric patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is a total thyroidectomy. This recommendation applies to all stages of PTC, including papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (≤1 cm, T1a) tumors. Objective: To evaluate the characteristics of American Joint Committee on Cancer T1 PTC tumors in a large pediatric population and to identify a subgroup of patients who may benefit from a thyroid lobectomy instead of a total thyroidectomy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2009, to May 31, 2020. The study took place at a tertiary care medical center and included 102 patients who were surgically treated for T1 PTC: 52 with stage T1a (≤1 cm) tumors and 50 with stage T1b (>1 cm but ≤2 cm) tumors. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes included the presence of bilateral disease and lymph node metastasis. Results: A total of 102 patients (mean age, 15.3 years [range, 9.7-18.9 years]; 84 girls [82.4%]) were included in the analysis. Among 52 patients with T1a tumors, 10 (19.2%) had bilateral disease, and 15 (28.8%) had central neck lymph node (N1a) metastasis. Among 50 patients with T1b tumors, 10 (20%) had bilateral and 13 (26%) had N1a disease. Of those with T1a, unilateral multifocality was associated with bilateral disease (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3-3.4) and N1a disease (OR, 5.1; 95% CI, 1.5-17.6). Both N1a disease (OR, 20.0; 95% CI, 3.5-115.0) and ≥4 positive lymph nodes (OR, 8.6; 95% CI, 1.2-60.9) were associated with bilateral disease. In patients with no pathologic evidence of lymph node metastasis (N0), there was a 95% rate of unilateral PTC. In patients with T1b tumors, unilateral multifocality was also associated with bilateral disease (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.7). Patients with T1b tumors had an increased risk of lateral (N1b) neck lymph node metastasis when compared with those with T1a tumors (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.0-14.5). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that, in patients with unifocal T1a PTC without clinically evident nodal disease on preoperative ultrasonography, a thyroid lobectomy and central neck dissection may be considered. If there is no evidence of unilateral multifocality or if there are fewer than 4 positive lymph nodes on postoperative pathology, then close observation may be considered. These findings have substantial clinical implications and may result in practice changes regarding the extent of thyroid surgery on low-stage pediatric PTC.

Orbital Floor Reconstruction: A Comparison of Outcomes between Absorbable and Permanent Implant Systems.

There are distinct advantages and disadvantages between bioresorbable and permanent implants in orbital floor reconstruction. Our aim was to compare the outcomes and complications of resorbable implants and permanent implants in orbital floor fracture repair. A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent orbital floor fracture repair at a rural, tertiary care center from 2011 through 2016. Main outcome measures included improvement in diplopia, ocular motility, enophthalmos, hypoglobus, and infraorbital nerve sensation. A total of 87 patients underwent orbital floor reconstruction. After exclusion criteria were applied, 22 patients were included in the absorbable implant cohort, and 20 patients in the nonabsorbable implant cohort. All absorbable implants were composed of poly L-lactide/poly glycolide/poly D-lactide (PLL/PG/PDL), and nonabsorbable implants included both titanium/porous polyethylene (Ti/PPE) composite and titanium (Ti) mesh. Mean fracture surface area was 2.1 cm 2 (standard deviation [SD]: ± 0.9 cm 2 , range: 0.4-3.6 cm 2 ) for the absorbable implant group and 2.3 cm 2 (SD: ± 1.1 cm 2 , range: 0.6-4.4 cm 2 ) for the nonabsorbable implant group ( p = 0.58). There were no significant differences in diplopia, ocular motility, enophthalmos, hypoglobus, and infraorbital nerve sensation between absorbable and nonabsorbable implant groups. The mean follow-up time for absorbable and nonabsorbable implant groups was 622 (SD ± 313) and 578 (SD ± 151) days respectively ( p = 0.57). For moderate-size orbital floor fracture repairs, there is no difference in outcomes between absorbable implants consisting of PLL/PG/PDL and nonabsorbable implants consisting of Ti mesh or Ti/PPE combination.

Expanding Access: Cost-effectiveness of Cochlear Implantation and Deaf Education in Asia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of cochlear implantation (CI) with mainstream education and deaf education with sign language for treatment of children with profound sensorineural hearing loss in low- and lower-middle income countries in Asia. STUDY DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis. SETTING: Bangladesh, Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, and Sri Lanka participated in the study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Costs were obtained from experts in each country with known costs and published data, with estimation when necessary. A disability-adjusted life-years model was applied with 3% discounting and 10-year length of analysis. A sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of device cost, professional salaries, annual number of implants, and probability of device failure. Cost-effectiveness was determined with the World Health Organization standard of cost-effectiveness ratio per gross domestic product (CER/GDP) per capita <3. RESULTS: Deaf education was cost-effective in all countries except Nepal (CER/GDP, 3.59). CI was cost-effective in all countries except Nepal (CER/GDP, 6.38) and Pakistan (CER/GDP, 3.14)-the latter of which reached borderline cost-effectiveness in the sensitivity analysis (minimum, maximum: 2.94, 3.39). CONCLUSION: Deaf education and CI are largely cost-effective in participating Asian countries. Variation in CI maintenance and education-related costs may contribute to the range of cost-effectiveness ratios observed in this study.

Diagnostic Value of Lingual Tonsillectomy in Unknown Primary Head and Neck Carcinoma Identification After a Negative Clinical Workup and Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography.

OBJECTIVE: Diagnostic rates of unknown primary head and neck carcinoma (UPHNC) using lingual tonsillectomy (LT) are highly variable. This study sought to determine the diagnostic value of LT in UPHNC identification using strict inclusion criteria and definitions to produce a more accurate estimate of diagnosis rate. METHODS: In this retrospective chart review, records of patients who underwent LT for UPHNC were reviewed. Inclusion criteria included absence of suspicious findings on physical exam and positron emission tomography-computed tomography as well as negative biopsies after panendoscopy and palatine tonsillectomy. Following inclusion criteria, 16 patients were reviewed. A systematic literature review on LT for the workup of CUP was also performed. RESULTS: LT was performed using transoral robotic surgery (TORS), transoral laser microsurgery (TLM), or transoral microsurgery with cautery (TMC). Following LT, primary tumor was identified in 4 patients out of 16. Detection rate by technique was 1/6, 2/7, and 1/3 for TORS, TLM, and TMC respectively. Postoperative bleeding occurred in three patients (19%); however, this was not related to the LT. Following literature review, 12 studies were identified; however, only 3 had enough data to compare against. All three studies had a cohort with suspicious findings on clinical exam. A total of 34 patients had a negative workup, with no suspicious findings on clinical exam and subsequently received an LT. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that LT should be considered initially in the diagnostic algorithm for UPHNC. This study can increase the patient size in this cohort by approximately 47%.